Prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in a middle-aged population with overweight and normal liver enzymes, and diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive proxies.

The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasing at an alarming rate. Elevated liver enzymes are a primary reason to refer patients for further testing. However, liver enzymes within the normal range do not exclude the presence of MASLD. We examined the prevalence of MASLD in a middle-aged population with overweight and normal liver enzymes. In addition, we examined the accuracy of 4 sets of noninvasive proxies for MASLD. We included 1017 participants from the Netherlands epidemiology of obesity cohort study with body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and liver enzymes (asparate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase) within normal range. The diagnostic accuracy of biomarker scores (fatty liver index, liver fat score [LFS], STEATO-ELSA, and hepatic steatosis index) was determined against elevated hepatic triglyceride content measured by 1proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Participants (mean age 56 years, 49% women), had a median body mass index of 29.6 kg/m2 and a median hepatic triglyceride content of 4.4%. MASLD was present in 42% of participants and was more common in men than women, with respectively 47% and 36% being affected. The LFS showed the highest accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.72. We identified metabolic syndrome as the prime predictor for MASLD with an odds ratio of 2.95 (95% confidence interval 2.20-3.98). The prevalence of MASLD in middle-aged men and women with overweight and liver enzymes within the normal range is over 40%. LFS showed the highest accuracy to detect MASLD, but, overall, biomarker scores performed relatively poor. The presence of metabolic syndrome was the prime predictor of MASLD.

Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dacarbazine for malignant paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dacarbazine (CVD) can be used for palliative treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. However, the precise effect of this chemotherapeutic regimen on tumour volume is unclear. The main objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effect of chemotherapy with CVD on tumour volume in patients with malignant paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma. METHODS: A literature search was performed in October 2013 to identify potentially relevant studies. Main outcomes were the pooled percentages of complete response, partial response and stable disease after chemotherapy with CVD. A meta-analysis was performed with an exact likelihood approach using a logistic regression. Pooled percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. RESULTS: Four studies concerning a total of 50 patients with malignant paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma reported on treatment with a combination of CVD chemotherapy. A meta-analysis of the effect of chemotherapy on tumour volume showed pooled percentages of complete response, partial response and stable disease of, respectively, 4% (95% CI: 1%-15%), 37%(95% CI: 25%-51%) and 14% (95% CI: 7%-27%). Only two studies concerning a total of 35 patients assessed the response on catecholamine excess; pooled percentages for complete, partial and stable hormonal response were 14% (95% CI: 6%-30%), 40% (95% CI: 25%-57%) and 20% (95% CI: 10%-36%), respectively. Duration of response was also reported in only two studies with a median duration of response of 20 months and 40 months. CONCLUSIONS: Data on the effects of a combination of CVD chemotherapy on malignant paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma suggest that a partial response concerning tumour volume can be achieved in about 37% of patients and a partial response on catecholamine excess in about 40% of patients. However, in the included studies, the protocol when to initiate treatment was not well described. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that the reported effect of chemotherapy on tumour volume reflects the natural course of the disease, at least partially.